ADAPT Methodology® Blog

OKR Metrics: A Comprehensive Guide

The popular goal-setting framework known as OKR (Objectives and Key Results) is used by many businesses to boost performance and accomplish company goals.

The framework's popularity has grown recently as a result of its effectiveness and simplicity. However implementing OKRs successfully requires choosing the appropriate metrics for tracking the development.

In this post, we'll go over the fundamentals of OKR measurements, the distinction between lead and lag metrics, give examples of excellent and bad OKR metrics and explain why it might be difficult for businesses to define strong OKRs.

Overview of OKR Metrics

OKR metrics are the quantifiable outcomes used to monitor progress toward a goal. The objective and the key results are the two elements that make up an OKR in most cases. The objective is a particular goal that the business or team intends to accomplish that is measurable, defined, and time-bound. The target must be attained in order to achieve the key results, which are measurable milestones.

Progress can be monitored using OKR metrics at different organizational levels. Company-wide OKRs may be established to monitor overarching revenue or growth goals. Teams might establish OKRs to raise customer satisfaction or lower attrition. Setting OKRs can help people perform better or learn new abilities.

Comparison of lead and lag metrics

Lead metrics and lag metrics are the two categories into which OKR metrics can be divided. Lead metrics help teams estimate future outcomes since they are predictive measurements. On the other side, lag metrics are retroactive metrics that assess prior performance.

Lead metrics are crucial for enhancing team productivity and accomplishing organizational goals. They can assist teams in anticipating potential issues and modifying their course of action to prevent unwanted effects. As an illustration, a team might establish a lead metric to count customer complaints.

By monitoring this indicator, they can spot potential problems with their goods or services and take steps to fix them before they cause unhappy customers to leave bad reviews.

Lag measurements are still significant, but they offer less useful data. They assess past performance and are retrospective. The volume of sales produced in the preceding quarter, for instance, could be a lag statistic. Although this information is valuable, it does not offer any advice on how to increase upcoming sales.

Good OKR Metric Examples

Good OKR metrics are measurable, relevant to the goal, and specified. Additionally, they must be feasible within a particular time range. Here are some illustrations of effective OKR metrics:

Objective: In Q1, raise client retention by 10%.
Key results

  • By 5%, lower the turnover rate.
  • Add 10 points to the customer satisfaction rating.
  • 15% more people will make recurring purchases.

The important outcomes in this illustration are precise, quantifiable, and pertinent to the goal. Additionally, they offer detailed instructions on how to accomplish the goal.

Objective: Launch a new product by the third quarter.
Key results

  • Product design completed by the end of Q1.
  • Towards the end of Q2 complete product development.
  • Beta testing must be done by the end of Q2.

The important outcomes in this instance are clear and quantifiable. They also offer a precise schedule for completing the task.

Objective: Raise employee output by 15% in the second quarter.
Key results

  • 20% more jobs will be done overall.
  • 10% less time should be spent on each task on average.
  • Boost the score for employee engagement by 5 points.

The important outcomes in this illustration are precise, quantifiable, and pertinent to the goal. They also offer suggestions for enhancing worker productivity.

Bad OKR Metric Examples

Poor OKR metrics are ambiguous, overly broad, or unrelated to the goal. They could also be too simple or too challenging to accomplish. Following are some instances of poor OKR metrics:

Objective: Boost revenue in Q2.
Key results

  • 50% more people will visit the website.
  • Up 20% of the number of followers on social media.
  • Attend three business gatherings.

The purpose in this instance is unrelated to the important results. Although more social media followers and website traffic may result in more sales, these factors are not exact indicators of how well a product is selling. It may also be advantageous to attend industry events, but it is unclear how this would help increase sales.

Objective: Improve the corporate culture in Q3.
Key results

  • The number of employee birthday parties should be increased.
  • Organize an all-company pizza party.
  • Establish a corporate mascot.

The major findings in this instance are too broad and ambiguous. Birthday parties and pizza parties may raise spirits, but they do not directly reflect the culture of the workplace. Additionally, developing a company mascot has nothing to do with enhancing workplace culture.

Objective: Boost revenue in the fourth quarter.
Key results

  • Spending should be 10% less.
  • 20% more in revenue.
  • Get a lottery win.

The major outcomes in this illustration are neither attainable nor pertinent to the goal. While lowering costs and raising income are commendable objectives, winning the lottery is outside the company's control and cannot be used as a yardstick for success.

Problems with Defining Good OKRs

A good OKR definition might be difficult for businesses. The improper OKR metrics can lead to misplaced goals, unmotivated workers, and resource waste. Here are some frequent challenges businesses encounter while creating effective OKRs:

Lack of Clarity: Businesses may find it difficult to create precise and unambiguous objectives. Undefined or ambiguous intentions can lead to significant outcomes that are unclear or irrelevant.

Lack of Buy-in: Employees could not completely comprehend or support the company's goals. The inability to get staff buy-in might make goals harder to achieve.

Utilizing excessively difficult OKR metrics measurements or trying to measure too many measures, businesses may do both. This might make it challenging to monitor development and comprehend how activities affect outcomes.

Lack of Data: Businesses might not have the information necessary to track their progress toward a goal. Setting defined and measurable key results may be challenging as a result.


Tracking progress toward attaining corporate objectives requires the use of OKR metrics. Different forms of information are provided by lead and lag metrics, which can be used by teams to change their course of action and perform better.

Good OKR metrics are measurable, relevant to the goal, and specified. It can be difficult to define good OKRs, but with the right strategy, businesses can create effective objectives that boost success and performance.

Did you like this article?

We enable leaders to become highly valued and recognized to make an impact on the World by helping them to design Digital Product Companies that will thrive and nourish in the Digital Age, we do this by applying our own ADAPT Methodology®.

If you want to know how we can help you to start your transformation please check out our: Training.

If you are interested in doing a transformation in your company please check out our: Consulting.